summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/published/LR4/lr4/post.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/LR4/lr4/post.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/published/LR4/lr4/post.txt13
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/LR4/lr4/post.txt b/old/published/LR4/lr4/post.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..35e27ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/published/LR4/lr4/post.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+I wrote a review of the Lightroom 4 beta for Wired's Gadget Lab, but do to space constraints I didn't go into the kind of detail that more serious photographers might want to know. Of course if you're a serious photographer, you could just go download the beta yourself, which, if you're the curious type, I suggest you do, though I would not use it with images you care about. The only thing I have that you don't have is that I got to sit down with Adobe's Tom Hagaarty, the head of Lightroom and take a tour of the new features. There's nothing in what follow that you can't find on your own or in Adobe's reference material, but if you'd like a guided tour, read on.
+
+Anyway, here's the part that doesn't spin in Wired: Lightroom is an awesome piece of software and this is written for people that think likewise. If you perfer Aperture or Bibble (now part of Corel I believe) then this is not for you.
+
+Okay, if you're still with me here's where
+
+
+I haven't had any problems with it ruining images, but I still wouldn't trust beta software to do anything with my images.
+
+
+When I talk about libraries and images below I'm referring to a cloned duplicate of a portion of my library (I copied about 10,000 images over to test Lightroom 4.
+
+