summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/published/poker-old.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/poker-old.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/published/poker-old.txt20
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/poker-old.txt b/old/published/poker-old.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..df9a6a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/published/poker-old.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+Not only are there a myriad of possibilities but there's another element that computers typically stumble upon -- uncertainty.
+
+And in the case of Poker, there are two uncertainies the software must deal with -- what cards does the opponent hold and how will s/he play them?
+
+To overcome the uncertainties of opponents, the programmers that developed Polaris couldn't use the look-ahead approach of Big Blue, instead they relied on , appropriately enough, game-theory.
+
+
+
+there is a set of strategies such that every player's return is maximized and no player would benefit from switching to a different strategy.
+
+Texas Hold 'em is a little more complicated than "Rock, Paper, Scissors," but Nash's math still applies. With game theory, computers know to vary their play so an opponent has a hard time figuring out whether they are bluffing or employing some other strategy.
+
+But game theory has inherent limits. In Nash equilibrium terms, success doesn't mean winning - it means not losing.
+
+"You basically compute a formula that can at least break even in the long run, no matter what your opponent does," Billings said.