diff options
author | luxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net> | 2019-05-04 15:48:55 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | luxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net> | 2019-05-04 15:48:55 -0500 |
commit | 79fafe2f44f5e31522dd93013950474342bfdfb0 (patch) | |
tree | bc9ccf5b4eadeebf3a2f86b21f9b382edfa41735 /old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed | |
parent | 62167091560c908db0613bcb35ff9ae8292f5961 (diff) |
archived all the stuff from freelancing for wired
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed')
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/27b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 5522 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/culy.jpg | bin | 0 -> 4899 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/google-image.jpg | bin | 0 -> 7583 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/googleimagesearch.txt | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/html.jpg | bin | 0 -> 6682 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/imgtag.txt | 29 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/lightroom.txt | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/nightly.txt | 17 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/reboot.txt | 17 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/table.jpg | bin | 0 -> 5925 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/tattoquotes.jpg | bin | 0 -> 15722 bytes |
11 files changed, 79 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/27b.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/27b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7d67eae --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/27b.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/culy.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/culy.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..440152c --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/culy.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/google-image.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/google-image.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d484053 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/google-image.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/googleimagesearch.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/googleimagesearch.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..23874f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/googleimagesearch.txt @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +I just got done testing some IE 7 add-ons and in the course of doing so I noticed that Google has once again changed the [Google Image Search][2] results page. About a month ago Google changed the Images search results page so that it hid the details for images until you hovered over them with your mouse. While the results page looked tidier, many were unhappy that it required an extra step to see the details of an image. + +There was [Greasemonkey script][2] to revert the search results page back to how it was, but it would seem that Google must have gotten some negative feedback on the change, because they've rolled it back to the old look. + +It's a minor thing and I suppose it could even be a bug or something, but since I prefer the old results page it's good to see it back. I can't help but wonder though, why not just provide a little link to toggle the display behavior according to the user's preferences? + +[1]: http://images.google.com/ "Google Image Search" +[2]: http://userstyles.org/style/show/1711 "Greasemonkey: Google Image Search back to normal"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/html.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/html.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..dd2f4d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/html.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/imgtag.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/imgtag.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2ef27a --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/imgtag.txt @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +I spend a fair bit of time perusing the web for images to go with theses posts and I generally limit my search to Flickr because Flickr makes it easy to find Creative Commons Attribution Licensed work. Sometimes I remember that there's actually a [dedicated search engine for CC-licensed work][3], but neither of these solutions is optimal. + +Let's face it, Google, Yahoo and the other big boys that offer image searches, have a wider and deeper reach than the smaller players. But the problem with the big image search engines is that it's very difficult to find out what licenses govern the images shown in the results. + +Now for the purpose of thumbnails on this blog, legal speaking, there is a good set of precedents that thumbnails falling under Fair Use guidelines. However, not only could that be challenged if someone was angry that I used their image, but it doesn't cover me if I want to use a full size picture. + +Even removing legal concerns, the truth is I just prefer to use CC licensed images because, well, I like to support and draw attention to the CC and reward the people who use it with back links from this site. I like sharing. + +Naturally there are those that spent all of their childhood with that "does not play well with others" description checked on their report cards. For them modern copyright was invented and serves the intended purpose. + +Earlier today I wrote about how Google appears to have [reverted their image search][2] results to display size, format and other information below each photo and I started thinking it would be really nice to see the license information displayed as well. + +Google displays license information in the Code Search results -- why not images? + +Well for one thing, there's no simple way for Google to figure out what license applies to an individual image. I suppose it could try to guess it from meta tag information, but often the content of page is governed by a different license than the images. Consider a forum page for instance, each member might have his own license for the images he posts and that license might differ from the one listed in the meta tag. + +Which led me to this idea: the (X)HTML specs should add an attribute to specify the license governing a photograph. + +Currently there are 11 attributes for the img tag, 2 required and 9 optional. Frankly the tag is already bloated enough that I don't think one more attribute is going to matter. Something as simple as <code>lic="license-abbr"</code> would do wonders for image rights on the web. + +Not only would a license attribute help image search engines, it would help protect copyrighted works by drawing attention to the fact that they are copyrighted. + +Now I'll admit I haven't thought this through all the way, there may be some good objections to the idea that I haven't thought of yet, which is why I posted this, to see what other developers think of the idea. Is it sound? Let me know what you think in the comments below. + +[Photo Credit][1] + +[1]: http://www.flickr.com/photos/melita/38992864/ "Flickr: Body" +[2]: http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/02/google_rolls_ba.html "Google Rolls Back Image Search Design" +[3]: http://search.creativecommons.org/ "Search Creative Commons"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/lightroom.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/lightroom.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1a440cd --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/lightroom.txt @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +Earlier this year [Adobe announced][1] that it was taking Photoshop Lightroom out of beta and into the wild and yesterday they did just that. Lightroom 1.0 [is now shipping][2] and there's a 30 day trial version available for download. + +I'm currently testing out the 1.0 version for an in depth review that will be on Wired later this week, but if you'd like to go ahead and dive in yourself, [grab the demo version][2]. Note that the demo will require you to create an Adobe ID if you don't already have one (if you're like me and have an ancient Macromedia ID, that will work as well; after updating my profile I was able to download the demo). + +If you've got strong feelings about Lightroom, I'd love to know what you like/dislike about the new version. + +[1]: http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/01/adobe_announces.html "Adobe Announces Lightroom 1.0" +[2]: http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/ "Photoshop Lightroom"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/nightly.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/nightly.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4f8a5ca --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/nightly.txt @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +The Nightly Build: + +* The long rumored CBS-YouTube deal appears to have [fallen through][1]. The Wall street Journal reports that the two companies were unable to reach an agreement. + +[1]: http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=internetNews&storyid=2007-02-21T055223Z_01_N20215795_RTRIDST_0_OUKIN-UK-GOOGLE-CBS.XML&src=rss "Possible YouTube deal with CBS unravels" + +* Frances E. Allen, 75, was [awarded][2] the $100,000 Turing Award yesterday for her work at IBM. Allen helped create techniques that optimized the performance of compilers. The Turing Award is one of the most prestigious prizes in computing and this is the first time in the award's 40-year history that it's been awarded to a woman. Better late than never I guess. + +[2]: http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2007/02/21/579614-first-woman-honored-with-turing-award "First Woman Honored With Turing Award" + +* Microsoft hastily [removed a banner advertisement][3] that appeared on its instant-messaging program for a software application that falsely hypes security threats on a user's computer. Of the "scareware," Microsoft spokeswoman Whitney Burk writes: "we immediately investigated the reports and removed the offending ads, as this is a violation of our ad-serving policy." + +[3]: http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20070220/tc_infoworld/86192 "Microsoft falls victim to shady scareware" + +* Today's web zen: [broken image stamps][4]. + +[4]: http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/21/broken-image-stamps/ "Neatorama: Broken Image Stamps"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/reboot.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/reboot.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7af8a33 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/reboot.txt @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<img alt="Any_key_3" title="Any_key_3" src="http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/any_key_2.jpg" border="0" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />The Morning Reboot: + +* The kids are not alright, in fact they're [a bunch of dirty pirates][1]. The RIAA has announced it will be increasingly targeting college students in the fight against copyright infringing downloads. Just as a note for those applying to college this year, Purdue says it rarely even notifies students accused by the RIAA because it's too much trouble to track down alleged offenders -- "we are a leading technology school with thousands and thousands of curious and talented technology students." + +[1]: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070221/ap_on_hi_te/downloading_music "AP: Recording industry targets colleges" + +* Google has [patched a potentially serious security hole][2] in its Google Desktop tool. The cross-site scripting hack was discovered earlier this year, but Google says the vulnerability has been patched by an automatic update. + +[2]: http://news.wired.com/dynamic/stories/G/GOOGLE_DESKTOP_SECURITY?SITE=WIRE&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT "Google Shuts Hole in Desktop Product " + +* [ITunes outs classical music fraud][3]. The recordings of Joyce Hatto, a British concert pianist who found fame in the last years of her life, have been exposed as hoaxes. Last week, a critic at Gramophone magazine popped a Hatto recording of Lizt's 12 Transcendental Studies into his computer and noticed that iTunes identified the disc as recorded by another pianist, Lászlo Simon. The critic dug out the Simon album and discovered it sounded exactly the same as the Hatto one. + +[3]: http://www.gramophone.co.uk/newsMainTemplate.asp?storyID=2759&newssectionID=1 "Masterpieces Or Fakes? The Joyce Hatto Scandal" + +* Photobucket has announced a partnership with Adobe to [bring web-based video editing][4] technology to the site. The new editor on Photobucket is a Flash-based application that Adobe claims will bring the editing capabilities similar to Adobe Premiere Elements to Photobucket users. + +[4]: http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20070221005493&newsLang=en "Photobucket Brings Free Web-Based Video Editing to Millions of Photobucket Users"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/table.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/table.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7088ff5 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/table.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/tattoquotes.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/tattoquotes.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..de05278 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.19.07/Wed/tattoquotes.jpg |