diff options
author | luxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net> | 2019-05-04 15:48:55 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | luxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net> | 2019-05-04 15:48:55 -0500 |
commit | 79fafe2f44f5e31522dd93013950474342bfdfb0 (patch) | |
tree | bc9ccf5b4eadeebf3a2f86b21f9b382edfa41735 /old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/03.19.07/Fri/paint.txt | |
parent | 62167091560c908db0613bcb35ff9ae8292f5961 (diff) |
archived all the stuff from freelancing for wired
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/03.19.07/Fri/paint.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/03.19.07/Fri/paint.txt | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/03.19.07/Fri/paint.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/03.19.07/Fri/paint.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..960cba6 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/03.19.07/Fri/paint.txt @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +Here's the strangest thing I've seen in a while, a U.S. based company announced last week that they have [created a wireless blocking paint][1]. Contrary to what you might think, the intended use is not to help those who claim wifi signals induce headaches, but rather as a means of containing the signal within a building. + +A bit of digging reveals that WiFi blocking paint is not a new idea. In fact security expert [Bruce Schneier notes][2] an [Information Week article][3] on similar technology way back in 2004. The company mentioned in that article is even [still in business][4]. + +The chief problems with wifi-blocking paint appear to be, powerful antennas can generally still pull out a signal, mobile reception inside the building is most likely equally blocked and then there's whole problem with windows. + +According to this press release from EM-SEC, the makers of this new wifi shielding paint: + +>The tests demonstrated that intellectual property can no longer be stolen through the airwaves while inside an EM-SEC-coated facility. The results showed that a one-time application of the EM-SEC Coating creates an "electromagnetic fortress" by preventing airborne hackers from intercepting signals. + +To be honest I can't even tell if the press release is a hoax or not. I don't think it is but the outlandish claims do seem a bit much. Either way if you believe the above statement please contact Michael and I using the links to the right as we have some valuable antique bridge hardware you will absolutely love. + +On a serious note, I wonder is putting a coat of this paint, say on the bedroom walls, would help the folks that claim wifi signals give them migraines and other health problems? + +[photo credit][5] + +[1]: http://emsectechnologies.com/press_releases/press1.php "EM-SEC Technologies Announces Successful Test of Wireless-Blocking Paint" +[2]: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2004/12/wifi_shielding.html "Wi-Fi Shielding Paint" +[3]: http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=56200676 " Startup Markets Wireless-Security Paint" +[4]: http://www.forcefieldwireless.com/products.html "Force Field Wireless" +[5]: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tiseb/209240887/ "Flickr: Free wifi"
\ No newline at end of file |