diff options
author | luxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net> | 2020-04-28 10:21:17 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | luxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net> | 2020-04-28 10:21:17 -0400 |
commit | a222e73b9d352f7dd53027832d04dc531cdf217e (patch) | |
tree | ccc1b5c54986980141faee867318ca80e45ebef5 /old/published/poker-old.txt | |
parent | 1337c4eafe29252d892d2bde0276212ac77382d4 (diff) | |
parent | e67317b0a6f02fd75f198cd22f83c20076c61dcf (diff) |
Merge remote-tracking branch 'wired/master' adding wired to conde
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/poker-old.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/poker-old.txt | 20 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/poker-old.txt b/old/published/poker-old.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..df9a6a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/poker-old.txt @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ + + + + + +Not only are there a myriad of possibilities but there's another element that computers typically stumble upon -- uncertainty. + +And in the case of Poker, there are two uncertainies the software must deal with -- what cards does the opponent hold and how will s/he play them? + +To overcome the uncertainties of opponents, the programmers that developed Polaris couldn't use the look-ahead approach of Big Blue, instead they relied on , appropriately enough, game-theory. + + + +there is a set of strategies such that every player's return is maximized and no player would benefit from switching to a different strategy. + +Texas Hold 'em is a little more complicated than "Rock, Paper, Scissors," but Nash's math still applies. With game theory, computers know to vary their play so an opponent has a hard time figuring out whether they are bluffing or employing some other strategy. + +But game theory has inherent limits. In Nash equilibrium terms, success doesn't mean winning - it means not losing. + +"You basically compute a formula that can at least break even in the long run, no matter what your opponent does," Billings said. |