summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.01.05/Fri/ms-more.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.01.05/Fri/ms-more.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.01.05/Fri/ms-more.txt1
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.01.05/Fri/ms-more.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.01.05/Fri/ms-more.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 8b70894..0000000
--- a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.01.05/Fri/ms-more.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-Just for the record -- Microsoft is not evil. Microsoft is a publicly traded company run by non-evil human beings who work to protect the company's market share and profitability just like any other company. I recently wrote an article for Wired.com [criticizing][2] Microsoft's attempt to foist a "open" standard on office software users, but in spite of what many readers seem to think, I don't think Open Office XML (OOXML) is a deliberate attempt to screw over users. The problem is that Microsoft's best interests and users best interests do not always overlap. For our tech-savvy Monkey Bites readers who'd like a more detailed explanation of how and why OOXML is not good for users, Rob Weir has an excellent post entitled [*How to hire Guillaume Portes*][1] that digs into some of the problems with OOXML in more detail. From Weir's article: >It is quite possible to write a standard that allows only a single implementation. By focusing entirely on the capabilities of a single application and documenting it in infuriatingly useless detail, you can easily create a "Standard of One." ... As I've stated before, if this were just a Microsoft specification that they put up on MSDN for their customers to use, this would be par for the course, and not worth my attention. But this is different. Microsoft has started calling this a Standard, and has submitted this format to ISO for approval as an International Standard. It must be judged by those greater expectations. [1]: http://www.robweir.com/blog/2006/01/how-to-hire-guillaume-portes.html "How to hire Guillaume Portes" [2]: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/software/0,72403-0.html?tw=wn_index_2 "MS Fights to Own Your Office Docs" \ No newline at end of file