summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.29.07/Tue/vista2.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.29.07/Tue/vista2.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.29.07/Tue/vista2.txt23
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.29.07/Tue/vista2.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.29.07/Tue/vista2.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1e10def
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/01.29.07/Tue/vista2.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+At this point there isn't much I can tell you about Windows Vista that you probably haven't already heard, so consider this entirely subjective, but I really like Vista. I installed Vista through Apple's Bootcamp in order to test Office 2007 and have since converted that installation to a Parallels-based virtual machine.
+
+As Leander [noted recently][1] on Cult of Mac, Vista is screaming fast when you run it natively on recent Mac hardware and I'd agree with him that Vista "feels" faster than OS X in many respects.
+
+On moving my installation over to a virtual machine, the speed dropped off considerably, but it's still very usable. Vista performs at speeds roughly the same as XP (also running in a virtual machine), but I did find that disabling the Aero effects sped things up quite a bit. Your own experience will depend somewhat on how much RAM you allow Parallels to allocate to Vista -- I'm giving it 640MB.
+
+Quite frankly I did not expect to be particularly impressed with Vista, but I am. I like the design, it has a very dark, classy look to it. You can dismiss that as irrelevant if you want, but I appreciate well thought out design choices and Microsoft certainly pulled out all the stops with Vista.
+
+Of course I'm not using Vista extensively, I don't have to live in it. If I did, you can bet I'd be complaining about DRM and peripheral support among other things. If you're seeking an objective point of view, have a look at Bruce Gain's [recent article][5].
+
+I now have four operating systems running on my Macbook, OS X, Vista, XP and Ubuntu Linux. Granted most people don't test and write about software for a living so you might not have any need for such diversity, but it's certainly doable if you're interested.
+
+For the most part I still work in OS X, but using [Firefox][2] for browsing, [Thunderbird][3] for email (IMAP), and [emacs][4] for writing I'm able to get more or less the same experience across all the platforms.
+
+And I'm learning to rely less on vender specific software and more on cross-platform solutions so that the tools I need for my day to day work needs are platform independent. I like Vista, I like OS X and I like Linux, but I don't want to be tied to any of them.
+
+
+
+[1]: http://blog.wired.com/cultofmac/2007/01/running_vista_o.html "Running Vista on a Mac"
+[2]: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/ "Firefox 2"
+[3]: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/releases/2.0b2.html "Thunderbird Beta 2"
+[4]: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/ "emacs"
+[5]: http://www.wired.com/news/culture/reviews/0,72295-0.html "Why You Don't Need Vista Now" \ No newline at end of file