diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue')
15 files changed, 150 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/ZZ3AC61D18.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/ZZ3AC61D18.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2bed6f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/ZZ3AC61D18.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allcode-logo.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allcode-logo.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b58a446 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allcode-logo.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allthecode.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allthecode.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..06ad6c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allthecode.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allthecode.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allthecode.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..38c03f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/allthecode.txt @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +AllTheCode is a new search engine designed to help you locate useful source code from around the web. AllTheCode joins an already crowded field that seems increasingly dominated by Google Code Search, but AllTheCode offers a few nice touches that set it apart. + +AllTheCode is currently listed as alpha and at the moment it only returns results in Java. AllTheCode claims that its results are rated by frequency of use, however I couldn't find any info on whether that means how often the entire files is used or whether that is broken down further by function or included lib. + +In addition to only returning Java results, AllTheCode doesn't support regular expressions which is a shame since that is the only way to effectively search through code in my opinion. Straight keyword searches are going to return much more "junk" than something you can filter with complex regular expressions. + +On the brighter side, AllTheCode is much better at displaying code than other engines I've used, including Google Code Search. Results pages are displayed with the first ten or so lines of code and then a link. Clicking the link will display the code with syntax highlighting right in your browser. If the code is what you're looking for, you can then download the remote file. + +The preview is handy and saves you from having to download the file right away. This way you can browse through the code, see if it actually does what you're looking to do and then download it. + +One of the really nice things about Google Code Search is that it displays the license that the code is released under right along side each search result (or at least when it can parse out a license, which is fairly often). Currently AllTheCode doesn't offer such functionality, but hopefully that'll be added in the future. + +The site performed well, searching was fast and code previews were quick as well. A couple of times the code previews were slightly mangled by character set issues, but that could also be my browser settings. + +I'm not a Java programmer so I can't vouch for the quality of the results returned, but a few quick scans for "strcmp" and other common functionalities returned relevant results. That is, the engine found implementations and functions named strcmp, whether or not they were good Java implementations isn't something I feel qualified to judge. + +As with any niche search field, the more the merrier and while AllTheCode still has a ways to go, it's definitely worth adding to your toolkit if you're a Java programmer. If Java isn't for you, check back in a little while, AllTheCode promises support for more languages is coming soon. + +[1]: http://www.allthecode.com/ "AllTheCode.com"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/elsewhere.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/elsewhere.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dc953ee --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/elsewhere.txt @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +Elsewhere on Wired: + +* Listening Post's Stewart Rutledge [has discovered][1] that a prostitution service in Brazil now offers a weekly iPod videos showcasing the latest talent. From the post: "M.Class, a Brazilian virtual brothel, says that the videos increase the ladies sex sales by three times in the weeks following the video posts." + +[1]: http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/02/brazilian_prost.html "Brazilian Prostitutes Turn On iPod" + +* Chris Kohler at Game Life [reports][4] that the latest run of Xbox 360s are using a new, quieter DVD drive -- "too bad for the ten million people who already bought an Xbox 360." + +[4]: http://blog.wired.com/games/2007/02/360s_new_quiete.html "360's New, Quieter Disk Drive" + +* This is the coolest thing you'll see today: [The Charleston, synchronized to Daft Punk's 'Around The World.'][2] Courtesy of John Brownlee at Table of Malcontents. + +[2]: http://blog.wired.com/tableofmalcontents/2007/02/daft_punk_does_.html "Daft Punk Does The Charleston" + + + +* Bodyhack's Randy Dotinga wins today's best headline award with: Inbreeding: [Bad for Kings, Good for Fish][3]. + +[3]: http://blog.wired.com/biotech/2007/02/inbreeding_bad_.html "Inbreeding: Bad for Kings, Good for Fish" + +[photo credit][5] + +[5]: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/269050017/ "Transmit Your Images Elsewhere"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/gummy.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/gummy.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e54a95b --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/gummy.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/india-scaffolding.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/india-scaffolding.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b50f3f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/india-scaffolding.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/iso.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/iso.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..16a35f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/iso.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/ooxmliso.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/ooxmliso.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6dd1fbd --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/ooxmliso.txt @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<img alt="Office" title="Office" src="http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/office.jpg" border="0" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />Microsoft has received another couple of setbacks in its bid to [control office document format][1]s. Microsoft's Open Office XML document format has been challenged by a number of international groups. + +The International Standards Organization (ISO) will soon begin evaluating the feedback of member countries regarding the proposed spec. Reportedly, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and UK are submitting contradictions to OOXML, which may derail a proposed fast track process. + +While not directly related to ISO approval both [Texas][2] and [Minnesota][3] have recently introduced bills to the state legislature that would mandate the current ISO standard Open Document Format for all government documents. If the bills pass Texas and Minnesota will join Massachusetts and over a dozen countries world wide that have mandated open formats for government documents. + +I'd like to point out, since it will inevitably come up in the comments, that these moves have very little to do with Office software packages. Microsoft Office 2007 offers a free download of ODF plugins which allow it to read and write most of the ODF formats. The issue in question here is whether or not Microsoft should have a lock on public document formats. + +Governments and businesses alike seem to be slowly waking up to the fact that tying themselves to Microsoft and its document formats puts them at the whim of the Redmond giant. + +For those that would like to learn more about the difference between Microsoft's proposed document format and ODF can start with the Wikipedia article on the subject. Yes that Wikipedia article, which Microsoft attempted to have paid shills edit. + +You could also turn directly to Microsoft's manual on OOXML, but I have to warn you it's over 6000 pages long. With the possible except of Marcel Proust, no one should ever write 6000 page documents. + + +[1]: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/software/0,72403-0.html "MS Fights to Own Your Office Docs" +[2]: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=80R&Bill=SB446 "Texas Bill to consider open document format for electronic state documents" +[3]: http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0176.0.html&session=ls85 "Minnesota Preservation of State Documents Act"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/picme.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/picme.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ab0cb6b --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/picme.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/picme.tx b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/picme.tx new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a9e20e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/picme.tx @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +[Picme is a photo sharing application][1] currently in development over at Raizlabs. This could well turn out to be vaporware, but there is a movie (after the jump) that seems to show a working app. Normally we don't give much attention to software announcements, we prefer to wait for the actual product, but PicMe is novel enough to warrant a look. + +Picme seems to be aimed at the photo catalogue market which would put it alongside [Google Picasa][2], [Adobe Lightroom][3] and others, but it features a very unique 3-D interface that offers a "perspective view" to allow users to sift through large collections of photos. + +Some the highlights listed on the site include: + + +* Unique view to handle large collections of photos (Patent Pending) +* Sharing-centric design makes it easy to share with individuals, clients, groups and social networks. +* Plug-in architecture allowing us to support photo editing tools as well as sharing service providers such as Flickr. +* Progressive on-demand client side upload means no wait uploads and quick downloads even for large image files. + + +Picme certainly looks and sounds like an interesting piece of software. And the 3D nav system seem like it would right at home with Windows Vista's Aero interface. Perhaps spatial navigation is going to be the next Windows UI design trend. + +Raizlabs claims Picme will be released later this year. In the meantime, if you'd like to find out more there's a mailing list you can join. We'll be sure to give you a full review if and when it becomes available. + +[1]: http://www.raizlabs.com/software/picme/ "PicMe - professional photo sharing application" +[2]: http://picasa.google.com/ "Google Picasa" +[3]: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom/ "Adobe Lightroom" + +<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y9u7zdFLaxE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y9u7zdFLaxE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/reboot.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/reboot.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b52c9e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/reboot.txt @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<img alt="Any_key_3" title="Any_key_3" src="http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/any_key_2.jpg" border="0" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />The Morning Reboot: + +* Walmart has [jumped in the digital movie download game][1] with a huge splash announcing that it will be offer downloads from all six major studios, something no one else has been able to do until now. Participating movie studios include 20th Century Fox, Disney, Lions Gate, MGM, Paramount, Sony Pictures, Universal and Warner Bros. The bad news: downloads will cost roughly the same as in-store DVD purchases, ranging from $13-$20 for new releases and $7.50 and up for older titles. The store will also include television shows. + +[1]: http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=internetNews&storyid=2007-02-06T142601Z_01_WEN3625_RTRUKOC_0_US-WALMART-HP.xml&src=rss "Wal-Mart launches new movie, TV download service" + +* Leander Kahney, of Cult of Mac fame, points out something many people may not know, the recent settlement between the Beatles and Apple means that Apple [can now sell iPods pre-loaded with music][2], something they were previously unable to do according to an older agreement. + +[2]: http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,72656-0.html?tw=rss.index "IPod Will Be the New CD" + +* Is Apple using its iPod muscle to slow adoption of Windows Vista? The official [Apple page on the subject says][3]: "iTunes 7.0.2 may work with Windows Vista on many typical PCs. Apple recommends, however, that customers wait to upgrade Windows until after the next release of iTunes which will be available in the next few weeks." If you feel like installing Vista now Apple has [released the iTunes Repair Tool for Vista 1.0][4], which may help with some, but not all, iTunes-Vista issues. + +[3]: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305042 "iTunes and Windows Vista" +[4]: http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/itunesrepairtoolforvista10.html "iTunes Repair Tool for Vista 1.0" + +* Microsoft is warning of a new zero day flaw in Microsoft Excel that could allow remote code execution. The warning affects Excel in Microsoft Office 2000, Office 2003 and Office XP, as well as in Office 2004 for Mac. Currently there is no patch available. + +[5]: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/932553.mspx "Vulnerability in Microsoft Office Could Allow Remote Code Execution" + +* Princeton Library is the latest university library to [join Google's ambitious Google Book Search project][6] which aims to scan the world's libraries and make them searchable over the Web. As with the other 11 participants Princeton, will be offer only public domain books (roughly 1 million). + + +[6]: http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&storyid=2007-02-06T012745Z_01_N05495149_RTRUKOC_0_US-GOOGLE-LIBRARIES.xml&src=rss "Princeton libraries join Google book-scan project"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/tut.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/tut.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fc82c4e --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/tut.txt @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +Structure matters. If you want your blog to be more discoverable to those searching Google, you need to tell Google what your site is about. Once upon a time there was and HTML meta tag that could do that for you, but then spammers abused the heck out of those so Google and the rest largely ignore them. So how can you tell Google what your site is about? + +In the process of digging through Google's [revamped Webmaster Tools][6] earlier today I learned some more things I've done on my personal blog that were not a good idea. So armed with my own stupidity as an example here's a case study of what not to do (you could also view source on this page for a good example of bad structural decisions -- sigh). + +Google prioritizes items on your page using (X)HTML structural elements. For instance, wrapping something in an h1 tag will tell Google the contents of that tag are more important than the contents of what's inside and h2 tag. And so on. + +Which brings me to today's two pronged point. Structure your pages well using [semantically meaningful HTML][5] and learn to love the lede. Do not for instance add a span tag with an RSS feed inside your h2 tag because it allows you to work around an IE 5.5 float bug. This will cause Google to think that the link and text inside it are just as important as your headline. + +Until I started working for this fine journalistic institution, I thought "lede" was some sort of obscure reference to [Leda][1], but it turns out that is incorrect. After my training period (ordering *All The Presidents Men* from Netflix) I learned that [lede][3] refers to the first sentence of your post, which ideally should sum up roughly everything you're writing about -- [the 5 W's][4]. Your reader should be able to skim the lead and more or less know what you're going to say. + +If you're like me you don't naturally think of ledes and in fact you might even pride yourself on long winded introductions that frequently have nothing to do with what you're writing, that's fine but you should still write a lede. True a blog is not a newspaper, but in many ways search engine spiders read your page as if it were a newspaper. + +If you feel like the lede is cramping your creative style just stick it above your article like a long sub-headline or off in a sidebar, but tag it with high priority tags and get it in the code. Wrap your ledes in tags that are one headline level less than your headline, because, while I can't guarantee it, I'd be willing to bet that it will end up being the two line excerpt that appears below your page headline in Google search results. + +Armed with that brief synopsis, potential readers will theoretically be more inclined to click through to your site than if your page summary in Google's search results reads: "click for RSS feed." + +Of course this is largely speculation on my part since I don't know the inner workings of Google's page crawling methods -- YMMV. + +And before we go I wanted to address something John Brownlee over at Table of Malcontents [brought up about yesterday's tutorial][2] (which applies to today's as well). Brownlee argues that titles (and ledes) aren't as important as I've made them out to be. + +>The thing of prime importance in running a successful blog is consistently writing enough content that people know that every time they come back, there'll be something new. Traffic begets bigger traffic: if you're making the posts, people will keep checking, and more and more links will come into your site. + +And that is absolutely correct. These added tips are built on the assumption that you're already producing interesting content and producing it frequently. If you don't start with basics none of these fine tuning tips are going to make up for your lack of quality content. If you don't build it, they won't come. + +[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leda_and_the_swan "Leda and the Swan" +[2]: http://blog.wired.com/tableofmalcontents/2007/02/yesterday_in_wi_3.html "Better Blogging, Cheap Booze, Mind Control, Madonna Kidnapped By Neo-Nazis" +[3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_style "Lede" +[4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ws "Five Ws" +[5]: http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/01/tutorial_o_the__1.html "Tutorial 'O The Day: XHTML Semantics" +[6]: http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/02/google_adds_lin.html "Google Adds Links To Webmaster Tools"
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/webmaster-tool-2.jpg b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/webmaster-tool-2.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9b1e8b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/webmaster-tool-2.jpg diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/webmaster.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/webmaster.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3a8555b --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Tue/webmaster.txt @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<img alt="Googlelogo" title="Googlelogo" src="http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/googlelogo.jpg" border="0" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />Google added a small but very useful feature to its Webmaster Tools suite yesterday. In addition to the diagnostic, statics, and sitemaps tools there is a new tab, links, which displays information about who is linking to your site. + +The top level display breaks down how many other sites are linking to you and what pages they link to. In the column that shows how many people are linking to that page, every number is a link that lets you drill down into the specific for that URL. + +In two clicks you can get a list of every page on the internet that links to you (well at least those that Google is aware of). + +How frequently your site gets crawled will determine how up to date the inbound link data is. If your site just made the front page of Digg, it might be a little while before that information shows up. + +There's also a section that shows you how many internal links your site has, though this data will be heavily weighted to the pages in your main site menu since they appear on overy page. + +I've always found Google's Webmaster Tools to be of limited usefulness because it's very slow to update and doesn't seem to flush its old listings very often. For instance it still lists dozens of pages that haven't been on my site in almost a year. + +However the new links feature is very nice and makes Webmaster Tools a bit more interesting. + +While I like the new Webmaster Tools, I can't help wondering why it wasn't added to Google Analytics or for that matter why Google doesn't just merge Webmaster Tools and Analytics.
\ No newline at end of file |
