diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/06.04.07/Thu/vista.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/06.04.07/Thu/vista.txt | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/06.04.07/Thu/vista.txt b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/06.04.07/Thu/vista.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..73aeb7e --- /dev/null +++ b/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/06.04.07/Thu/vista.txt @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +After swearing up and down that it was [done with Service Packs][1] and that Windows Vista was "secure out of the box," it would seem that Microsoft does indeed have plans for Vista SP1, though no dates have yet leaked. + +A number of bloggers noticed this week that a document [posted][2] to the Microsoft Download Center carries the title: "Windows Automated Installation Kit Documentation (Windows Server code named "Longhorn" & Windows Vista SP1 Beta 3)" + +There have been a couple other leaks as well, though Microsoft continues to officially deny plans for Vista SP1 (no doubt hoping to encourage consumers waiting for SP1 to go ahead and buy Vista now). + +It seems safe to assume at this point that some sort of Service Pack upgrade for Vista is in the works, but so far no time table has been released. + +[via [ZDNet][3]] +[1]: http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/04/microsoft_says_.html "Microsoft Says No To Large Vista Service Packs" +[2]: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=c0758bb7-b0c9-4a70-9462-4e3e8e3176b1&DisplayLang=en "Windows Automated Installation Kit Documentation (Windows Server code named "Longhorn" & Windows Vista SP1 Beta 3)" +[3]: http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=495 "More Windows Vista SP1 sightings (and frustrations)"
\ No newline at end of file |