8 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/else b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/else
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..90eee08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/else
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<img width="200" height="135" border="0" src="http://blog.wired.com/tableofmalcontents/images/pans.jpg" title="Pans" alt="Pans" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; float: right;" />Elsewhere on Wired:
+
+*	Cult of Mac's Leander Kahney [asks][1]: EMusic Sells DRM-Free Music, Why Doesn't Steve Jobs? Indeed.
+
+[1]: http://blog.wired.com/cultofmac/2007/02/emusic_sells_dr.html "EMusic Sells DRM-Free Music, Why Doesn't Steve Jobs?"
+
+*	Listening Post also has some follow up on Jobs' anti-DRM rant with some tasty quotes from the RIAA, who apparently [think Jobs wants to license Fairplay][2]. The thing is, Jobs writes the exact opposite in his letter. It just goes to show you that even the fabled reality distortion field of Steve Jobs is no match for the reality distortion field of the RIAA. All your rights are belong to us.
+
+[2]: http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/02/riaa_response_t.html "RIAA Response to Steve Jobs' Thoughts on Music?"
+
+*	27B Stroke 6's Ryan Singel is at the RSA security conference where [Javascript vulnerabilities are all the rage][3]. Isn't that why everyone stopped using Javascript the first time around -- because it was too easy to exploit? Just because it got a shiny new acronym doesn't mean it's easier to write secure code. 
+
+[3]: http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/02/web_20_as_a_sto.html "Web 2.0 As A Story To Be Destroyed by Hackers"
+
+*	If you haven't seen Guillermo del Toro's amazing movie *Pan's Labyrinth*, don't follow this link, it gives away the ending (and much more), but Table of Malcontent's Annalee Newitz has an [interesting analysis][4] of the film. More importantly, if you haven't seen it yet hurry up and do so before it disappears from theaters.
+
+[4]: http://blog.wired.com/tableofmalcontents/2007/02/pans_labyrinth_.html "Pan's Labyrinth – Can Fantasies Rescue Us from Fascism?"
+\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/gmail.jpg b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/gmail.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f940c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/gmail.jpg
diff --git a/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/goodbye.jpg b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/goodbye.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..721805d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/goodbye.jpg
diff --git a/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/nightly.txt b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/nightly.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3e8458c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/nightly.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+The Nightly Build:
+
+*	Google has joined the cable companies to say that the [internet can't handle movie downloads][1]. Google says the bandwidth strain of movie download services like Joost will bring the network to its knees. The Internet was not designed for TV Google claims. Good. Let's not put TV on the internet.
+
+[1]: http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=internetNews&storyID=2007-02-07T182929Z_01_L0767087_RTRUKOC_0_US-CABLE-WEBTV.xml&pageNumber=1&imageid=&cap=&sz=13&WTModLoc=NewsArt-C1-ArticlePage1 "Google and cable firms warn of risks from Web TV"
+
+
+*	Two significant flaws have been found in Firefox. The first is a [flaw in the pop up blocker][5] that shipped with Firefox 1.5 which allows remote sources to read local files. The second vulnerability is more serious and [allows phishing sites to fool Firefox][6] into thinking that the site is secure. The phishing attack appears to work on newer versions of Firefox including the most recent v2.0.0.1.
+
+[5]: http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5JP051FKKE.html "Firefox Popup Blocker Allows Reading Arbitrary Local Files "
+[6]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367538 "Firefox 2.0.0.1 Phishing Protection bypass"
+
+*	[FuturePhone][2] has [gone the way of the Dodo][3]. Well sort of, the dodo wasn't sued for 2 million dollars that I know of, but they are both gone.
+
+[2]: http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/10/19/19pogue-email/ "The Final Word on Futurephone"
+[3]: http://gigaom.com/2007/02/07/atts-free-call-bill-2-million/ "AT&T’s Free Call Bill: $2 Million"
diff --git a/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/reboot.txt b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/reboot.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..74004b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/reboot.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<img alt="Any_key_3" title="Any_key_3" src="http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/any_key_2.jpg" border="0" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />The Morning Reboot:
+
+*	Amazon and TiVo [have announced a new video download service][1]. However, unlike competing offerings (such as Walmart's disastrous launch yesterday), the new partners will download movies and TV shows directly to customers' televisions via their TiVos. So far officials refused to give a target date for the service's launch.
+
+[1]: http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=internetNews&storyid=2007-02-07T053842Z_01_N06308517_RTRUKOC_0_US-TIVO-AMAZON-DOWNLOAD.xml&src=rss "Amazon, TiVo to test movie downloads direct to TVs"
+
+*	The RIAA [received a huge setback][2] yesterday when a judge ordered the music lobby group must pay the attorney fees for a woman wrongfully accused of illegal downloading. The judge, echoing sentiments of just about everyone but the RIAA, called the suit "frivolous and unreasonable." Listening Post [has more details][3].
+
+[2]: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005114.php "Big Win for Innocent RIAA Defendant"
+[3]: http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/02/scoop_label_mus.html "Label Must Pay P2P Defendant's Legal Fees"
+
+*	Hackers [attacked][4] the DNS servers that form the backbone of the internet yesterday. Several key DNS servers saw a traffic spike yesterday morning experts say, which is usually a sure sign of an attack. The good news is the servers stood up to the attack.
+
+[4]: http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-6156944.html?part=rss&tag=2547-1_3-0-20&subj=news "Internet backbone at center of suspected attack"
+
+*	It appears one the home-planet's (Cond&#233; Nast) auxiliary tentacles (CondeNet) has [acquired][6] [flip.com][7], a social networking site for teen girls.
+
+[6]: http://sev.prnewswire.com/computer-electronics/20070206/AQTU04206022007-1.html "CondeNet Launches Flip, New Online Outlet for Teen Girls' Creativity"
+[7]: http://www.flip.com/ "Flip.com"
+
+
+*	TSIA: [World's Oldest Paper Ditches Newsprint][5]
+
+[5]: http://blog.wired.com/furthermore/2007/02/worlds_oldest_p.html "World's Oldest Paper Ditches Newsprint"
+\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vista-beginners.jpg b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vista-beginners.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9f4013c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vista-beginners.jpg
diff --git a/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vista-beginners.txt b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vista-beginners.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b641214
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vista-beginners.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+Continuing with our Vista Month theme, we recently came across the excellent [Vista for Beginners][1] website, which is chock full of advice, tutorials, tips and tricks for those migrating to Windows Vista. 
+
+Much of the content on Vista for Beginners is aimed at XP users, but even those migrating from older systems and those who are brand new to the world of Windows will find some time and frustration saving gems in here.
+
+Right now Vista for Beginners doesn't have a huge amount of content, but you can expect that will change as more people adopt Vista and start looking for help. Especially useful for those familar with past version of Windows is the "[Where to find...][2]" section of Vista for Beginners, which so far has tutorials for restoring the Shut Down and Log Off buttons as well as the good old "Run" button.
+
+If you're having trouble adjusting to the Vista way of thinking, or if you're thinking about upgrading, but are worried about having to learn a new workflow, Vista for Beginners can help ease the transition.
+
+[1]: http://www.vista4beginners.com/ "Windows Vista For Beginners"
+[2]: http://www.vista4beginners.com/where-to-find "Windows Vista For Beginners: Where to find"
+\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vistamyths.txt b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vistamyths.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cd4b521
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/Webmonkey/Monkey_Bites/2007/02.05.06/Wed/vistamyths.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Users concerned about upgrading to Windows Vista should have a look at Tech Republic's recent article [dispelling Windows Vista myths][1]. With the release of any new OS there's bound to be a certain amount of FUD percolating around the internet. In Vista's case the main rumors I've seen are that it breaks all your software, it's just eye candy, and it requires a new computer.
+
+That last item has been played up extensively in the mainstream press and no doubt gets encouraged by retail salesmen and hardware manufacturers, but the truth is Vista will probably run on your existing machine. You may need to upgrade your RAM and you may not get the Aero glass interface, but that *is* eye candy.
+
+Deb Shinder's article does a good job of pulling together the top ten myths about Windows Vista and separating rumor from fact.
+
+The article doesn't just dispel anti-Vista rumors though, it also takes Microsoft to task for propagating the myth that Vista will solve all your security worries.
+
+>Because much of operating system, including its networking technologies, has been redesigned and new code written, Vista is likely to present some vulnerabilities that weren't in older versions of the OS even as it fixes many that were. This is true of any new software and Vista, despite its focus on security and Microsoft's best efforts, is no exception.
+
+>In fact, Microsoft shipped the first critical security update for Vista over a year ago, when it was still in the beta testing stage. It will be just as important with Vista as with any other operating system to ensure that updates are installed regularly. The danger is that novice users, hearing that Vista is more secure, may let their guard down and fail to take the protective measures necessary to prevent attacks, virus infestations, etc.
+
+Another popular rumor I've heard is that Vista won't run on dual core machines, which is not true, however here's something I didn't know:
+
+>In fact, all versions of Vista will run on a machine with multiple processors installed--but Home Basic and Premium will recognize and use only one of the processors.
+
+If you've been hesitating to upgrade because of rumors you've been hearing/reading check out the article, it does a good job of dispelling the FUD and getting down to the facts.
+
+[1]: http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10877_11-6156413.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=tr "Don't be misled by these 10 Windows Vista myths"
+\ No newline at end of file