summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/wired/old/published/firefox bloat/firefoxbloat4.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'wired/old/published/firefox bloat/firefoxbloat4.txt')
-rw-r--r--wired/old/published/firefox bloat/firefoxbloat4.txt76
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/wired/old/published/firefox bloat/firefoxbloat4.txt b/wired/old/published/firefox bloat/firefoxbloat4.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3d956b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wired/old/published/firefox bloat/firefoxbloat4.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+
+
+
+
+Firefox 1.5 saw the addition of a page cache mechanism that could be responsible for Firefox's memory woes. The browser stores the last 8 pages you viewed in your computer's RAM (if you have less than a gigabyte of RAM, it stores less).
+
+Caching pages in memory allows faster back-browsing -- meaning better performance as you navigate the web -- but this can be a lot of data and less RAM for other apps to use.
+
+Given the rising popularity of web-based applications which require greater amounts of system resources, could it be that the web is simply getting too heavy for a svelte browser to handle?
+
+
+
+
+
+Of course the flip side
+
+
+
+
+
+
+points out,
+
+Otherwise, you're having to run a browser with a zillion
+plugins - and none of them aware that other plugins might be running.
+You have a more stable program if said items are actually integrated
+into the base.
+
+
+
+Many of Firefox's memory usage woes come from a page cache mechanism introduced in version 1.5, the last major revision before the current version. The browser stores the last 8 pages you viewed in your computer's RAM (if you have less than a gigabyte of RAM, it stores less).
+
+Caching pages in memory allows faster back-browsing -- meaning better performance as you navigate the web -- but this can be a lot of data and less RAM for other apps to use.
+
+Given the rising popularity of web-based applications which require greater amounts of system resources, could it be that the web is simply getting too heavy for a svelte browser to handle?
+
+
+
+But as Chris Pirillo points out, "the issue isn't really about cluttering Firefox with more features that could slow it down and make it more unstable -- the issue is in not fixing outstanding, documented, replicable bugs before adding more features to the core."
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+But today many things that started out as extensions are now part of the Firefox core feature set and yet many problems remain.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bruce Perens, a open source advocate and observer, believes that whatever Firefox's problems, the community can repair them.
+
+"If customers want a stripped-down version of Firefox, someone in the open source world will make one that they like."
+
+Pirillo thinks Firefox may not keep up. "Some people love the simplistic nature of Firefox, but I'm one who believes that minimalism is a gigantic weakness."
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+The advent of more sophisticated web pages and applications has driven the Firefox developers to a major rewrite of Gecko the engine that renders pages in Firefox.
+
+Firefox 3 will use Gecko 1.9 which offers significant performance boosts even in the early alpha builds available today. Firefox 4 is also scheduled to include [Tamarin][1], a new Javascript rendering engine donated to Mozilla by Adobe.
+
+"In general we're psyched about the way people are pushing the limits of the web," Schroepfer says. "And we're excited about incorporating Tamarin into Firefox 4 which should significantly improve Javascript performance."
+
+