summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorluxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net>2016-11-17 09:10:23 -0500
committerluxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net>2016-11-17 09:10:23 -0500
commit2f2d8fe1a9ffc5b7710963670d50642e21d622a4 (patch)
treee2deba046cdb6e88ecbd4b822f8b27f5e2e79115
parent33501aec87bc34ffe8f64f1ff892fd1fff812920 (diff)
archived old articles
-rw-r--r--invoices/paid/scott_gilbertson_invoice_83.doc (renamed from invoices/scott_gilbertson_invoice_83.doc)bin15360 -> 15360 bytes
-rw-r--r--invoices/scott_gilbertson_invoice_84.docbin0 -> 15360 bytes
-rw-r--r--published/blisk.txt (renamed from blisk.txt)0
-rw-r--r--published/ubuntu1610final.txt (renamed from ubuntu1610final.txt)16
-rw-r--r--published/whyarch.txt (renamed from whyarch.txt)0
5 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/invoices/scott_gilbertson_invoice_83.doc b/invoices/paid/scott_gilbertson_invoice_83.doc
index 40a9388..40a9388 100644
--- a/invoices/scott_gilbertson_invoice_83.doc
+++ b/invoices/paid/scott_gilbertson_invoice_83.doc
Binary files differ
diff --git a/invoices/scott_gilbertson_invoice_84.doc b/invoices/scott_gilbertson_invoice_84.doc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d9af18e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/invoices/scott_gilbertson_invoice_84.doc
Binary files differ
diff --git a/blisk.txt b/published/blisk.txt
index 73eb3b8..73eb3b8 100644
--- a/blisk.txt
+++ b/published/blisk.txt
diff --git a/ubuntu1610final.txt b/published/ubuntu1610final.txt
index 9166bfb..6140f38 100644
--- a/ubuntu1610final.txt
+++ b/published/ubuntu1610final.txt
@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
-Canonical has released Ubuntu 16.10, it's second major update of the year. Ubuntu 16.10, codename "Yakkety Yak", is nowhere near the update that 16.04 LTS was earlier this year.
+Canonical has released Ubuntu 16.10, its second major update of the year. Ubuntu 16.10, codename "Yakkety Yak", is nowhere near the update that 16.04 LTS was earlier this year.
-That doesn't mean there's nothing new, in fact 16.10 does have a few new features to hold users over until the bright and shiny future of Unity 8 and Mir arrive sometime next year. Still it's very odd to have what feels like a smaller update arrive with Ubuntu's October release, which typically is the more experimental release with tons of new features being tested. This time around that's not really case. In what's become a familiar refrain for Ubuntu, most of the work is happening with the still-not-quite-there Unity 8.
+That doesn't mean there's nothing new, in fact 16.10 does have a few new features to hold users over until the bright and shiny future of Unity 8 and Mir arrive sometime next year. Still it's very odd to have what feels like a smaller update arrive with Ubuntu's October release, which typically is the more experimental release with tons of new features being tested. This time around that's not really the case. In what's become a familiar refrain for Ubuntu, most of the work is happening with the still-not-quite-there Unity 8.
-Ubuntu 16.10 marks the seventh time Unity 8 has not been ready for prime time. While Unity 8 appears to be progressing -- judging by developer updates and playing with pre-release versions -- it is, at this point, in danger of joining Duke Nukem Forever on the great vaporware list in the sky. Still, take heart Ubuntu fans, just as Duke Nukem Forever did eventually see the light of day, it seems very likely that Unity 8 and Mir will in fact be release eventually. Perhaps even as early as 17.04. Also, I have a bridge for sale, if anyone is interested.
+Ubuntu 16.10 marks the seventh time Unity 8 has not been ready for prime time. While Unity 8 appears to be progressing -- judging by developer updates and playing with pre-release versions -- it is, at this point, in danger of joining Duke Nukem Forever on the great vaporware list in the sky. Still, take heart Ubuntu fans, just as Duke Nukem Forever did eventually see the light of day, it seems very likely that Unity 8 and Mir will in fact be released eventually. Perhaps even as early as 17.04. Also, I have a bridge for sale, if anyone is interested.
-What remains to be seen is how long the Ubuntu faithful hang in there, waiting, hoping for Unity 8 and the accompanying Mir display server to get here, especially when, for the past few releases there are been little more than bug fixes to the primary Unity 7 interface. On one hand Unity 7 works just fine and its entirely possible that year from now Unity 8 bugs will lead to a great wailing for a return to the stability of Unity 7. Still, when you've been promised something and it keeps getting pushed back you eventually start to feel like a kid who's been told once again that Christmas has been postponed.
+What remains to be seen is how long the Ubuntu faithful will hang in there, waiting, hoping for Unity 8 and the accompanying Mir display server to get here, especially when, for the past few releases, there have been little more than bug fixes to the primary Unity 7 interface. On one hand Unity 7 works just fine and it's entirely possible that a year from now Unity 8 bugs will lead to a great wailing for a return to the stability of Unity 7. Still, when you've been promised something and it keeps getting pushed back you eventually start to feel like a kid who's been told once again that Christmas has been postponed.
-Unity 8 and Mir form two parts of what might loosely be called the future of Ubuntu. While two-thirds of the future may be still too deep in development to be usable, the other third is here, as been here and seen some real improvements in this release -- Snap applications.
+Unity 8 and Mir form two parts of what might loosely be called the future of Ubuntu. While two-thirds of the future may be still too deep in development to be usable, the other third is here, and has seen some real improvements in this release -- Snap applications.
Ubuntu's Snap applications are self contained applications. That is, they package all their dependencies within a container, which means you can easily install applications that would otherwise have conflicting dependencies. For example, if the version of Gimp you wanted to install needs libjpeg version 1.0 but your existing install of Darktable needs libjpeg version 1.1, you have a problem that's not easy to solve. Unless of course both are Snaps, in which case each would have the needed version of libjpeg available in its container.
Snap applications solve quite a few other problems and may even offer better security as well, but eliminating dependency conflicts is the biggest win for end users. For Ubuntu in particular Snaps represent a way around the problem of shipping very out of date GNOME packages. Snaps make it simple to keep the core GNOME packages wherever the Ubuntu devs need them, while allowing users to install more up-to-date version of their favorite software. Which is to say, you can have your LTS release and get your latest and greatest application updates too. Because there's no danger of pulling upgrades that mess up the rest of your system, you can always have the latest software without having to run the bleeding edge of the actual system software.
-Ubuntu 16.10 improves the Snap installation process by making Snap packages available alongside everything else in the GNOME Software app, er, sorry, the Ubuntu Software app. There's still no easy way to search for snap versions of apps specifically, but there are now screenshots available for Snap apps, something that was missing from the first release that arrived in 16.04. To find Snap apps you can search for "snap" and you'll get a partial list, but you'll still get far better results searching from the command line with the "snap find myapp" command.
+Ubuntu 16.10 improves the Snap installation process by making Snap packages available alongside everything else in the GNOME Software app, er, sorry, the Ubuntu Software app. There's still no easy way to search for Snap versions of apps specifically, but there are now screenshots available for Snap apps, something that was missing from the first release that arrived in 16.04. To find Snap apps you can search for "snap" and you'll get a partial list, but you'll still get far better results searching from the command line with the "snap find myapp" command.
-As for the experience of Snap applications themselves, well, it still very much depends on the application in question. LibreOffice, one of the bigger applications available as a Snap, is generally just as stable as its traditionally packaged counterpart, though thanks to the sandboxing of Snap apps, some features are missing (because they would be a security risk in the world of Snaps). Other applications I tried, like Krita seemed to work just fine (though there was a warning about the Snap version not working with proprietary NVidia drivers).
+As for the experience of Snap applications themselves, well, it still very much depends on the application in question. LibreOffice, one of the bigger applications available as a Snap, is generally just as stable as its traditionally packaged counterpart, though thanks to the sandboxing of Snap apps, some features are missing (because they would be a security risk in the world of Snaps). Other applications I tried, like Krita, seemed to work just fine (though there was a warning about the Snap version not working with proprietary NVidia drivers).
Like Unity 8 and Mir, Snaps are still a work in progress. The difference is that you can actually use Snaps today and there are real benefits to be had -- like avoiding dependency conflicts.
-It's also worth noting that Ubuntu has continued to work on its clone of the GNOME Software app and this release is, thankfully, much faster than what shipped with 16.04. The Software app also now handles stuff well outside the traditional software wheelhouse, like CLI apps, fonts and other system tools. I would call this a dubious "improvement". Fonts are certainly welcome, but does anyone really install CLI tools using a GUI? And many of the system tools feel like clutter when they show up in search results. The Software app's search results are also still a mixed bag, searching for "vi" returned now results at all. Searching for "vim" returned a dozen.
+It's also worth noting that Ubuntu has continued to work on its clone of the GNOME Software app and this release is, thankfully, much faster than what shipped with 16.04. The Software app also now handles stuff well outside the traditional software wheelhouse, like CLI apps, fonts and other system tools. I would call this a dubious "improvement". Fonts are certainly welcome, but does anyone really install CLI tools using a GUI? And many of the system tools feel like clutter when they show up in search results. The Software app's search results are also still a mixed bag, searching for "vi" returned no results at all. Searching for "vim" returned a dozen.
Another noticeable GNOME upgrade in this release is the Nautilus file browser. Ubuntu 16.04 shipped with the new very out of date Nautilus 3.14. Ubuntu 16.10, on the other hand, has jumped all the way to Nautilus 3.20, which means Ubuntu users get some of the new tools that GNOME users have enjoyed for some time, like the file transfer progress widget in the toolbar, popover bubbles for quickly renaming files and huge improvements to the search capabilities.
diff --git a/whyarch.txt b/published/whyarch.txt
index 6b6f01c..6b6f01c 100644
--- a/whyarch.txt
+++ b/published/whyarch.txt