diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'bookmarks/peak travel.txt')
-rwxr-xr-x | bookmarks/peak travel.txt | 138 |
1 files changed, 138 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/bookmarks/peak travel.txt b/bookmarks/peak travel.txt new file mode 100755 index 0000000..2df963c --- /dev/null +++ b/bookmarks/peak travel.txt @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +--- +title: A Road Less Traveled +date: 2011-08-04T17:03:16Z +source: http://www.psmag.com/environment/a-road-less-traveled-26524/ +tags: economics, travel + +--- + +Amid the planes, trains and automobiles of the holiday season comes a +surprising finding from transportation scientists: Passenger travel, +which grew rapidly in the 20th century, appears to have peaked in much +of the developed world. + +[A study of eight industrialized +countries](http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.518291), including +the United States, shows that seemingly inexorable trends — ever more +people, more cars and more driving — came to a halt in the early years +of the 21st century, well before the [recent escalation in fuel +prices](http://www.psmag.com/science-environment/peak-oil-and-the-return-of-the-jet-set-15395/). +It could be a sign, researchers said, that the demand for travel and the +demand for car ownership in those countries has reached a saturation +point. + +“With talk of ‘peak oil,’ why not the possibility of ‘peak travel’ when +a clear plateau has been reached?” asked co-author [Lee +Schipper](http://peec.stanford.edu/people/profiles/Lee_Schipper.php), +who shares his time between Global Metro Studies at the University of +California, Berkeley, and the Precourt Energy Efficiency Center at +Stanford University. + +Schipper and [Adam Millard-Ball](http://www.stanford.edu/~adammb), a +doctoral candidate at Stanford University, looked at the [gross domestic +product](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product) per capita +of the United States, Canada, Sweden, France, Germany, the United +Kingdom, Japan and Australia from 1970 through 2008 and plotted it +against the distance traveled per capita per year in each country by +car, pickup truck, bus, train, light rail, streetcar, subway and plane. + +Beginning in 1970, they found, motorized passenger travel grew rapidly +in all eight countries as greater prosperity led to rising car ownership +and domestic air travel. But after 2000, when per capita GDP in the U.S. +hit \$37,000, passenger travel stopped growing here. In the other +countries, passenger travel leveled out at a GDP of \$25,000 to \$30,000 +per capita. + +“A major factor behind increasing energy use and carbon dioxide +emissions since the 1970s has ceased its rise, at least for the time +being,” Schipper said. “If it is a truly permanent change, then future +projections of carbon dioxide emissions and fuel demand should be scaled +back.” + +The peak travel study runs counter to government models predicting +steady growth in travel demand well beyond 2030. Schipper and +Millard-Ball say that their own findings are “suggestive rather than +conclusive.” They speculate that highway gridlock, parking problems, +high prices at the gas pump and an aging population that doesn’t commute +may be contributing to peak travel. People already spend an average 1.1 +hours per day traveling from one place to another, and driving speeds +can’t get much faster. + +“You can’t pronounce one single factor for the slowdown in travel,” +Schipper said. “The most important thing will be to see what happens as +the economy recovers. Everybody expects oil prices to go up. But with +new fuel economy standards, more hybrids and higher oil prices competing +against a recovery in which people buy old-fashioned gas-guzzlers, the +question is, what is going to win?” + +Most of the eight countries in the study have experienced declines in +miles traveled by car per capita in recent years. The U.S. appears to +have peaked at an annual 8,100 miles by car per capita, and Japan is +holding steady at 2,500 miles. + +There are signs of saturation in vehicle ownership, too, at about 700 +cars per 1,000 people in the U.S. — [more cars than licensed +drivers](http://www.cleanenergycouncil.org/files/Edition27_Full_Doc.pdf) +— and about 500 cars per 1,000 people in Japan and most of the European +countries. Car ownership has declined in the U.S. since 2007 because of +the recession. + +“You get to a point where everybody who could possibly drive, drives,” +Schipper said. + +Finally, researchers found, the energy intensity of cars and light +trucks has declined in all eight countries since 1990. (Energy intensity +is the amount of fuel expended per passenger-mile, or one passenger +moving one mile.) + +At the same time, though, vehicle occupancy declined, as more and more +people drove alone. In the U.S, the average vehicle occupancy is 1.7 +people per car, down from 2.2 in 1970, reflecting a likely shift away +from carpooling. So, for example, in 2007, car travel in the U.S., with +two-thirds of the seats empty, was more energy-intensive than U.S. air +travel, because the planes were more than 80 percent full, on average. + +There’s no question that the task of reducing carbon dioxide emissions +in transportation is daunting. According to one estimate, [vehicle +travel in the U.S. would have to fall by half by +2050](http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es801032b), or fuel +efficiency would have to improve to 130 miles per gallon, or biofuels +would have to make up most of the fuels on the market to avoid the worst +impacts of climate change. + +And people still like to buy big, heavy cars that can accelerate to 60 +mph in less than four seconds. In a separate study this year, Schipper +found that [technological improvements to vehicle efficiency drove down +fuel +use](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VGG-51J17FP-1/2/428493477db36dde85bc58942c86d824) +per unit of horsepower by 50 percent in recent years, even as most of +the potential fuel savings were wiped out by consumer’s preferences for +larger, more powerful vehicles, particularly in the U.S. + +Still, peak travel holds a glimmer of collateral benefits for the +industrialized world. Higher prices at the pump, including [higher fuel +taxes](http://www.civil.ist.utl.pt/wctr12_lisboa/int_01_conference_wmessage.htm), +could help stimulate the manufacture of smaller, less powerful cars, +change people’s driving habits and foment a renaissance in walking and +bicycling, reducing carbon dioxide emissions below their present levels, +Schipper said. + +The growth of motorized travel in China, India and Brazil will reduce +the overall impact of gains in the industrialized world, but they are +still gains, he said. The average American car on the road today uses a +third less fuel per mile than in 1973, and 20 percent less than in 1981, +he said. For European cars, the savings is between 20 percent and 25 +percent. + +Traffic is paralyzed everywhere, and that will be an obstacle to +motorization in the developing world in the end, Schipper said. + +“My basic thesis is, ‘There ain’t room on the road,’” he said. “You +can’t move in Jakarta or Bangkok or any large city in Latin America or +in any city in the wealthy part of China. I think Manila takes the +prize. Yes, fuel economy is really important, and yes, hybrid cars will +help. But even a car that generates no CO2 still generates a traffic +problem. + +“Sadly, what is going to restrain car use the most is that you can’t +move.” |