summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorluxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net>2016-02-04 10:10:58 -0500
committerluxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net>2016-02-04 10:10:58 -0500
commitd760635dc5f364a95799af17243f64c93ee283b1 (patch)
treefcb53dca419907d176e8f2b7dd47bf2c9dc79c21 /src
parent03f2dce52a0066774d8b58cfae2b0e148bb36b67 (diff)
added second backup piece
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backup-2.txt15
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/backup-2.txt b/src/backup-2.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..15ac8c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/backup-2.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+I wrote previously about how I backup database files automatically. The key word there being "automatically". If I have to remember to make a backup the odds of it happening drop to zero. So I automate as I described, but that's not really what making backups entails or at least that's not the point for me as a writer.
+
+The point for me as a writer is that I don't want to lose these words
+
+Ba
+
+In some cases "automate" can mean build workflows that spawn redundant copies. For example, right now I'm typing these words in Vim and will save the file in a Git repo that will get pushed to a server. Later the containing folder will be backed up on S3 plus a couple of local drives.
+
+It's unlikely I will loose these words outright.
+
+However, once I'm done writing I'll cut and paste this piece into my Django app and hit a publish button that will write the results out to the flat HTML file you're actually reading right now (this file is another backup). When I plugged it into the database I gave this article a relationship with other objects in that database. So even the redundant backups built into my workflow make a total data loss unlikely, without the database I will lose the relationships I've created.
+
+Which is just to illustrate what you already know: database backups are important and need to happen regularly.
+
+