summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/why.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorluxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net>2016-09-23 10:47:35 -0400
committerluxagraf <sng@luxagraf.net>2016-09-23 10:47:35 -0400
commit84065185f1da1ce66df7f80719a9e73c30e318f3 (patch)
tree85dfca803881bcec6f45e8637c96ca3bd14ea3ab /why.txt
parent53b95ad0b437f654046927fbcd32ca147c6f03de (diff)
started piece on Cloudland Canyon
Diffstat (limited to 'why.txt')
-rw-r--r--why.txt2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/why.txt b/why.txt
index 79ff0b4..d53c10b 100644
--- a/why.txt
+++ b/why.txt
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Quite the contrary, it promises to be a world in which raw survival, among other things, will depend on having *achieved at least a basic mastery of one or more of a very different range of skills. There’s no particular mystery about those latter skills; they were, in point of fact, the standard set of basic human survival skills for thousands of years before those glass screens were invented*, and they’ll still be in common use when the last of the glass screens has weathered away into sand; but they have to be learned and practiced before they’re needed, and there may not be all that much time left to learn and practice them before hard necessity comes knocking at the door.
-*L.E.S.S.—that is, Less Energy, Stuff, and Stimulation. * We are all going to have much less of these things at our disposal in the future. Using less of them now frees up time, money, and other resources that can be used to get ready for the inevitable transformations. It also makes for decreased dependence on systems and resources that in many cases are already beginning to fail, and in any case will not be there indefinitely in a future of hard limits and inevitable scarcities.
+*L.E.S.S.—that is, Less Energy, Stuff, and Stimulation.* We are all going to have much less of these things at our disposal in the future. Using less of them now frees up time, money, and other resources that can be used to get ready for the inevitable transformations. It also makes for decreased dependence on systems and resources that in many cases are already beginning to fail, and in any case will not be there indefinitely in a future of hard limits and inevitable scarcities.
*deliberate technological regression as a matter of personal choice is also worth pursuing.* Partly this is because the deathgrip of failed policies on the political and economic order of the industrial world, as mentioned earlier, is tight enough that any significant change these days has to start down here at the grassroots level, with individuals, families, and communities, if it’s going to get anywhere at all; partly, it’s because technological regression, like anything else that flies in the face of the media stereotypes of our time, needs the support of personal example in order to get a foothold; partly, it’s because older technologies, being less vulnerable to the impacts of whole-system disruptions, will still be there meeting human needs when the grid goes down, the economy freezes up, or something really does break the internet, and many of them will still be viable when the fossil fuel age is a matter for the history books.